Does ones own genes and DNA affect the way they perceive what they see and the experiences they have? If so are some people more adapted than others to pick up signs others do not? Would a native Indian of a long lost area or region of the planet perceive things differently than a member of the royal bloodline elite? Back to the subject of perception; I believe how you store data, take in observations, use your instincts to use this information, all goes back to some genetic component and some experience and nurture components. Personally, it appears to me that perhaps the best use of chemicals in the body and brain and how they are used is in part genetic and thus yes your bloodlines do in fact play a part in this. Science needs to study this more and study the subject without political correctness blinders. There is a reason things are the way they are, it is not by accident and it makes sense from a science standpoint, nurturing standpoint, etc. In the future science will figure out what makes some people human-plus and others who simply are content to live in mediocrity. It seems too often folks do not put up effort or try and then look to blame something or someone for their issues. This is unfortunate really. Because it turns these folks into "human-minuses" or less thans, almost as if a self-fulfilling prophesy. Although most of this topic is philosophy and considered fringe science we should be thinking here? So, consider this in 2006. |
